Why We Should Allow Drugs In Sports

Lance Armstrong
Lance Armstrong

Lance Armstrong

Everyday we are learning more and more about the latest drug scandals in our favourite sports. Whether it be Lance Armstrong’s confession (if you can call it that) on Oprah, or the daily revelations about doping cover ups in the AFL and NRL. But have we all got our knickers in a twist about nothing? Maybe. Here are a few arguments for allowing drugs in sport. I’m not saying they are correct, but maybe we should at least think about them.

It’s about the competition, stupid!

Look, when I watch AFL or Rugby League I want to see a bunch of fit young men in peak condition. I want to see excitement and I want to see excellence. If a well-supervised and healthy dose of modern drugs will help the players I like to watch achieve optimal fitness for each game, why should that worry me. We’re not just talking steroids here. Many banned substances are more related to recovery and healing than strength and stamina. But, personally, I see no issue with either.

There are some sports – or at least some events – that should remain drug-free. I don’t want to see how fast a drugged-up athlete can run the hundred metres – no, I want to see what a natural body can do. But for sports of pure competition – especially ones where strategy is just as important as strength – I just don’t care. We love watching the men play 5-set marathons at the Australian Open. If a well supervised drug regime will help them recover quickly and be ready for the next round, then I’m all for it.

Prohibition leads to deception and corruption

Well, this is the other thing. People are human… they’re going to want to try and push the envelope and try and hide their drug-use so that they can achieve that little bit extra success in their chosen sport. By enforcing a prohibition on performance enhancing drugs, people are naturally going to turn to deception to achieve their goals. Deception leads to corruption. It’s a slippery slope people!

Of course, the dangerous side to drug prohibition in sport is a lack of health standards. A well supervised drug regime will be less dangerous to our young athletes than some of the dodgy and dangerous practices we hear about from time to time. Roid-Rage anybody? Let’s make drugs in sport safe and free from corruption.

Some people are making a motza out of anti-doping!

This is a whole other kettle of fish. There are so many drug agencies all around the world. Sometimes I think more people are employed to enforce the prohibition on drugs than there are people actually playing the sports we like to watch. Surely there are better things we can spend our money on. Instead of employing all those scientists and technicians on developing newer and more efficient drug testing, why not employ them to develop safe and more efficient performance enhancing drugs? You know it’s a win WIN situation.

What do you think. Drugs in sports – good thing or bad thing?

Images by Mschlindwein and Daniel Norton, via Wikimedia Commons

Latest Posts By
  • Why I Won’t Comment on Your Site
  • Fiction: A Boy And His Swag
  • This Week: 20 Years, Happily Unmarried
  • Jessica Chapman

    I think you make some good arguments but one of the problems I have with it (particularly in regards to team sports) is that allowing it would severely disadvantage the poorer clubs who can’t afford the drugs.

    • http://johnanthonyjames.com/ John James

      Maybe they could have a “drug cap” like a “salary cap”? But then you hit the whole enforcement issue again… :)

    • Melissa Savage

      Sport disadvantages poorer people anyway. It’s why sports like swimming are overwhelmingly white and first-world. If you didn’t grow up on a farm, and have the funds to maintain horses, you have no chance of getting to the top of equestrian. Tennis has started to spread a little, but only because there were some very determined people (like Richard Williams) getting better access to courts and equipment, and it is still mostly white and rich. Gymnastics requires commitments of time, kit and travel that are beyond many ordinary families. If you are an Australian who can ski well, you are probably privileged enough to afford to travel to the snow regularly.

      One of the few sports that is equitable is running, because it doesn’t require special equipment or infrastructure; it’s about technique and hard work. Soccer is another game that is fairly equitable, because all you need is a ball and a bit of ground. And even then, sportspeople with more money do better because they have access to scholarships to allow them to train without worrying about money (like the Australian Institute of Sport), the best coaches, physiotherapists, nutritionists, exercise scientists etc. Drugs will be just another one of these variables that money allows you access to.

  • Not Graig

    The different codes have different reasons for pursuing drugs in their sport. In swimming, the recent hype was about discipline and performance. Ironically, the team took drugs that “didn’t affect their performance”. IDIOTS.

    In NRL and AFL, I think that the main issue being pursued by the federal police is the links to organised crime. Drugs is merely one avenue of approach for these criminals, who then have a black-mail lever and can pursue their main game of match-fixing (which is where the money is).

    So, in both these examples, competition wasn’t actually aided at all.

    • http://johnanthonyjames.com/ John James

      Yes, but in these cases, it was all “hidden”… prohibition leads to corruption… make it legal, and you break the links to organised crime…

  • An Idle Dad

    I’m with you, legalise it. I don’t even care about the 100 metres – could any event be more pressured to take drugs than this one, where pico-seconds are the difference between heroes and has-beens.

    The only thing I’d enforce is an age-limit, where super young kids (say 14) cannot take any sports related drugs and from 15 only specific drugs can be used up until 18 where open slather.

  • Maree Talidu

    I’m not a fan of the idea, what concerns me is that we would be sending a message to kids saying “yep, you can train all you want, but we will also give you pills to pop” and they’ll think that’s acceptable. If I knew certain sports were openly doping because it had become legal, I wouldn’t watch them anymore. Takes the essence of what true sportsmanship is to me. But that’s obviously just my opinion.

  • Pingback: This Week: Breakfast & Cleaning | KiKi & Tea()